Posted by
C-Hayes on Tuesday, June 05, 2007 1:47:37 PM
...in his latest "Talking Points Memo":"In Sunday's Times, editor Bill Keller put the JFK story on, ready, page 37 right above a story about kids playing at a Fuddrucker's restaurant. Every other New York City paper had the Muslim suspects on page one, where they should have been.
"Now apparently The Times isn't real concerned about Muslim guys allegedly trying to set up another 9/11. On page one of Sunday's New York Times was this story: some poor people in India making bricks....
"...The good news here is that most Americans in both parties understand that Muslim extremists want to kill us and will if they get the chance. So John Edwards looks dopey. The New York Times looks dishonest. And the far left loses all day long, which of course is a good thing.
"What is not a good thing is the press using its power to help a political party in its news pages. That is corrupt."
But...
It's almost as if O'Reilly doesn't go far enough. Is this really just "far-left" thinking? Or is it mainstream Democratic thought? When, out of the eight Democratic candidates for president of this country, seven (save Joe Biden) support limiting at best or eliminating at most our military funding...does that mean that O'Reilly thinks that seven of the eight candidates are "far-left"?
Because they aren't taking threats against our country very seriously - just like the New York Times.
And, just like the New York Times, all these Democratic candidates sit and wait for the Bush administration to fail to pounce on another political opportunity.
O'Reilly may say "far-left" to appear "fair and balanced."
But let's be honest instead...